All posts by Manuela DeVinna
| Mar 12th 2008, 04:53 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Dividends Re: Dividends |
|
| Seams we will not get dividents this month again :( that would be ok if we would at least been told what happenes with that money. Buying back SLWallet shares with SL-CapEx profits is not ok in my opinion. Manuela |
||
| Mar 12th 2008, 06:44 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Dividends Re: Dividends |
|
| Thats what makes me angry . two month with a profit of 500k and the infestors get nothing .. i dont realy think that is the idea of investing Manuela |
||
| Mar 13th 2008, 03:07 Manuela DeVinna |
General Investment Discussion » SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors Re: SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors |
|
| I agree with you her Borgart that bitching about problems whithout providing a idea for a solution is not realy helpfull. BUT i dont understand why you disrespect people who ask serious questions. One of the is for example "what is the big bill that will eat up L$ 1,000,000 that SlCapex hast to pay and that stops them from paying dividents." And the continued refusal to answer this questions IMHO an affront against all who where ptting their money in. Another one is "why put up rules and do nothing to eno force them ?" IMHO if there are rues for compalies that are listed here o someone who wants to invest in this company has a right to trust that this company will have to follow this rules. Telling people who continue to ask this questions and are not satisfied if they get a nebulous answer ,to better take their money and go away will shurely not help you to get people to invest again. Manuela |
||
| Mar 14th 2008, 15:23 Manuela DeVinna |
General Investment Discussion » SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors Re: SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors |
|
| Cash i understand that it is the decision of the CEO if dividents are payed . what i find a bit arogant is that after two monthh of a profit of 500k the only explenation for paying no divifdents is a nebulous invoices not billed yet. I littl more information would be realy nice. I think the big problem with this stok market is that a company doesnt take damage if the value of the shares drops significantly so the ceo can just say " what the hell do i care if all try to sell the shares ". And btw SLCapex shares realy can't drop much more. Manuela |
||
| Apr 10th 2008, 13:03 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Dividends Re: Dividends |
|
| Nice .. this month we saw dividents :) Now the only thing i would love to know is: There was a overall profit of 1.3 million Linden in the last 3 month . now there where 500 k payed out as dividents . It woudld realy help to know what happened to the 800 k where where they invested. or if they where holded back for Future Investements i would like to be able to see them somewhere showing up in a report. Manu |
||
| Apr 16th 2008, 01:43 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Arbitrage Wise please clarify buy back statement Re: Arbitrage Wise please clarify buy back statement |
|
| Hello Abitrage . that i think is not realy an asnwer . Will you buy back all shares BELOW 1.03 or all shares including ALL that are offered for 1.03 ? Manu |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 06:16 Manuela DeVinna |
Nestler Investments Corporation » IPO Still Selling Re: IPO Still Selling |
|
| Scott .. IMHO the liquidity was drained out of the market. I think to many people lost to many Lindes in the last time to be interested in nother investment. The once who would be willing to invest (like me for example) are not so happy to see how many company here are treating their questions so they rather keep their money in their pockets Manuela |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 07:31 Manuela DeVinna |
General Investment Discussion » Am I missing Something? Re: Am I missing Something? |
|
| Hello Cash .. it seams If it goes on like that, thre will soon be no company anymore that is traded ;) 5 companies at halt meanwhile ? Manuela |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 09:04 Manuela DeVinna |
General Investment Discussion » Am I missing Something? Re: Am I missing Something? |
|
| at Danielz Shackle but you are halted now since a long time why have you not posted this information up to now after the halt instead complaining about being halted ? Manuela |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 09:32 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair A sugestion how Arb could be Fair Edited by moderator Apr 17th 2008, 09:33 |
|
| Hello All I wanted to open this thread because i think that there was one question that was asked verry often "what should Arb have been done and how could a fair buyback look like " First of all i think that the transfer of the Account value itself to SlWallet shares was ok. It gave people who desparately needed the money a way to get some of it by taking a loss. What is not ok is how the Buyback is happening right now. I was reading a post where Arb was telling what ever he would do he would get complains and it would be "lose lose situation" or something like that . So i think i have to say "Congratualtions Arb that you where finding a way in this situation that will bring you some thousand US" Dollar of Profit " Now my sugestion about a fair way for the buyback: Evryone who wants his Shares bought back by arb should set them to sell for 1.03. Then when a buyback comes a sum of this offers should be made. Lets say there are 10.000.000 sell orders for 1.03. Arb wants to do a buyback with a volume of L$1.030.000 he could buy back 10% of the offers . then he could buy 10% of EVERY offer so someone who has set 100.000 shares would get 10.300 for 10.000 shares . leaving him with an open order of 90.000 shares. This way everyone would slowly see his money coming back . the daytraders would not make the big profit that arb doesnt want to give them and it would be fair especialy towards the people who trusted his word and even bought shares from the others who realy needed the money or didnt trust him. I would be realy interested in your opinions about this and especialy what Arbitrage thinks about this sugestion. I know that this is not something that the system could do automaticaly but as slcapex has access to the database it could shurely be done. Manuela |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 10:10 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair |
|
| Ivan Thats exactly the type of answers i didnt want to have here. Why ? because if he would simply sell everything as quick as possible this would probably mean a verry big loss and this would not be in the interest of the depositors. Please Ivan only for a moment assume that Arbitrage was realy Honest . He has invested in things that where able to pay the interest rate he offered us but therefore it had to be long term investments and simply selling them in a hurry would bring a big loss. Then why should a former depositor want this ? What i want here is to discuss what steps Arb could take if he is realy Honest and wants to act in the best way and interest for the investors and former depositors. If he doesnt take that steps then everyone knows what to think about him . But i dont want to go from the presumption that he isnt honest i want to go from the presumption that he is Manuela |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 11:07 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » The Future of NDX - What is your take? Re: The Future of NDX ; What is your take? |
|
| Hello About the options 1) I think Liquidation would not be a good idea why liquidate a successfull company 2) taking it private would have the problem that someone who needs the money would not be able to quickly sell the shares at market value. I would take it to another Exchange if you cant stay here Manuela |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 12:36 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair |
|
| about your first point Ivan. Yes i think he should make clear where the money went. If he made a bad decisions thats acceptable. But what would this information help ,. Do we have someone here who could check the documents ? He could simply say "i lost the money in a train accident in china " we could not poove it or could we ? So wouldn't this information be useless? And that his friends are defeniding him, if they know he wants to do the best ha can, is not realy something that i would see as to strange. But i agree that a consistent and plausible list of investemnts would help to build up trust. And if it isn't given i would like some statement form Arbitrage or an other competent person why we dont get this list. about your second point . Why would you hold trading ? if someone needs the money now you would only bring a problem to this person . Why not anonce that untill .. lts say end of the Month .. there will be a plan when aproximately the buybacks will come . Not with exact dates (there seams to be a problem with it i dont realy understand ) but may be if the plan would tell us thet aproximately each month there will be a buyback of a volume of about L$ 1.000.000 then we would have a kind of outlook to the future. And again if this isnt given i would like to have a satisfying explanation for it. One last point. What do you think about the buy back mode i sugested . would you consider this fair ? Manuela |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 01:31 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair Edited by moderator Apr 18th 2008, 01:32 |
|
| Hello Spm I think the first two points are correct Now that we are shareholders i am missing that there would be a meeting what should happen with slwallet. There are surely advantages for Arb now that he converted our accounts to shares. For example that he can buy back a big part of the money he owes us for only 50 to 70 cent per dollar. I think it would be legal to do so if he would also accept the disadvantages of it like that HE is not anymore the owner of slw . the shareholders are!! . So i think if he realy wants to be honest he has to set a shareholder meeting soon where where we could decide about the future of slw. i only doubt that your third boint would be a good idea if slw should be transfered into a working company . first it will be hard to keep trace how much is still to be payed out on each share so that a lot of people would be making mistakes in selling or buying shares . Especialy if slw should be transered into a working public company it needs its income to invest and work . We realy should take into account that this mess was not caused by Arb it was caused by LL who where simply throwing out a decision and only giving a verry short time for the change. Your sugestion would n mean the end of the company even if slw would be a healty company . And i don't think this is a hypotetical exercise. Up to now there was only complaining about arbs actions . What i want here is to find people who have better ideas and sugest them. On Arbs reactions to this ideas , his answers (or his faing to answer) we will be able to prove his honesty and good will. if i would be him i as well would not answer t most of the threads here because insulting, preconceived opinion and calling for the FBI is not a fair discussion. I would like him to take part in a fair discussion here. For me and i hope for a lot of people this will make things clear and show if we should stay with him or better get our money out of everything where he and his frinds have their hands in Manuela |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 01:54 Manuela DeVinna |
Nestler Investments Corporation » IPO Still Selling Re: IPO Still Selling Edited by moderator Apr 18th 2008, 01:57 |
|
| Scott i think you are suffering from something that people start to realize. You will hold the maiority of the shares. That means that you will make all decisions . The shareholders will have no influence. After the ipo is over a company doesn't suffer from a falling value of the shares. The owner even benefits from it because now he can buy back cheap and the difference is his. One good example is SLCapex itself . The shars are at a vallue of 0.3 or lower, they are not answering important questions and the shareholders can do nothing. So having such an example people, including me, are naturaly asking themself "how can i be shure that i am not treated like this if i invest in this company" or they simply left the maket, looking in sometimes if they can may be get some of thei money out of it . The willingness to bring in new money is close to zero in the moment Manuela |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 02:24 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » The Future of NDX - What is your take? Re: The Future of NDX - What is your take? |
|
| Cash . The question was (as far as i understood it ) what the shareholders think should be done if the trading halt is not removed. I dont have a problem with this place here i just would wish some people in the management would not be to arrogant to answer questions th are realy important for many of us (like what outstanding invoice is there that would eat up L$1.000.000 .. the rason for two month not paining dividents for slcapex). This is reducing the trust people have in this platform even if they dont have to do much with the platform itself but with the company that is running it an the people behind the company. Manuela |
||
| Apr 19th 2008, 02:49 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Moved From Shareholder Topic - What is wrong with Capex? Re: Moved From Shareholder Topic - What is wrong with Capex? |
|
| and thats exactly why people think about moving away from slcapex Manuela |
||
| Apr 19th 2008, 02:55 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair |
|
| Dont you think that Arb was starting this rumors himsef because he still didnt give out detailed infotmation where the money we we had deposited on JTF went ? This naturaly causes rumors as well as a way to buyback that brings him thousands of USD profit. So i think that one way to make this rumors die would be transparency . That seams what most people want it seams and i think it Arb was honest and trying to act in the best interest of the depositors and now shareholders this would not hurt him. Manuela |
||
| Apr 20th 2008, 00:45 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair Edited by moderator Apr 20th 2008, 00:47 |
|
| Hello Brogart Thank you for the link. Now there are some questions. The problem i have is , reading the Sheet, i still dont know what SLW Does. Looking at the Balance sheet for example i see a section Property Plant and Equipment : SL CapEx Software Development (carried at Total Development Cost)$4,435,470.00 Does this mean that the SLCapex software belongs to SLWallet and that it is getting some income from it ? Please be aware that many people who where putting their money on accounts at JTF Bank are neither natively english speaking nor are they realy familiar with Balnacing. (including me). I know normaly one would say that people who cant read such a balance sheet should keep their hands off of the stock Markets but in this case it wasn't the decision of this People to be involved in a stock market. So an explenation that realy tells People what this all means in a reasonable simple englich would help verry much. Manuela |
||
| Apr 20th 2008, 01:08 Manuela DeVinna |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » The Future of NDX - What is your take? Re: The Future of NDX - What is your take? Edited by moderator Apr 20th 2008, 01:11 |
|
| Cash Sometimes READING helps a lot ;) he asked the top 20 Shareholders not the top 10. I am one of the top 20 and after i had a look at ise i have to absolutely agree with Gen Ferraris. There are some features in there that SLCapex was refusing to put in with the excuse of bandwith (like a compleet list of the sell and buy offers ) or things like a list odf transactions of the CEO . This all looks much more Transparent then SLCapex and the fees are much lower. The fees at this place normaly would eat up two month of dividents of even the best listed companies if you want to sell your stock. If you take such a high fee your service should be best of the best and not wors then the one of a cometitor with better service. Manuela |
||
1 | 