All posts by Sando Haller
| Aug 7th 2007, 20:11 Sando Haller |
SLCapEx Suggestions » More Detail In IPO Application Status Re: More Detail In IPO Application Status |
|
| Joseph, since you just declared bankruptcy for your company on WSE, I hope you have no plans to IPO a company on this exchange. | ||
| Sep 8th 2007, 22:50 Sando Haller |
SLCapEx Suggestions » Good 'Till Cancelled (GTC) orders Re: Good 'Till Cancelled (GTC) orders |
|
| I can live with the 3 days; however, is it possible to put something on the website next to a person's sell order that lets them know when the order expires. I have a hard time keeping track or remembering when they will fall off and if the post-it falls off my monitor I can lose out for a day or two.:) | ||
| Oct 7th 2007, 16:09 Sando Haller |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » READ THIS! EVERYONE! Re: READ THIS! EVERYONE! |
|
| As a large investor of MECH, this is a big decision in my mind. I have a lot of faith in ImA and have a longtime commitment and complete trust in the YEP team who are working on the project. It is too bad there are not enough investors out there right now willing to fully buy out the IPO and let the full vision come out sooner rather than later. But, that does not seem like it is going to happen. With that in mind and after discussions with ImA and reading the opinions on this thread, I believe my vote has to be for less Mechs and doing the battle sim with a smaller IPO. There is still time for investors to jump on board here and fully subscribe this IPO. I hope everyone will give this another look. This is not just another investment fund or land company offering. These guys have a great unique vision to implement and are willing to invest their sweat equity to make it happen. We as investors can have an easy task of putting our money behind them and enjoying the ride to success. | ||
| Oct 11th 2007, 19:32 Sando Haller |
General Investment Discussion » For CEO's with companies on the exchange. Re: For CEO's with companies on the exchange. |
|
| I don't like posting much on the forums, but this one is very irksome. Cash, I thought your appointment with Capex was a good thing; not something that was going to start petty arguments on the forums. Yes, I am a large investor of YEP; they have only continued to meet all promises and expectations for many months which is not something very many companies in SL can say. Capex needs to quit nick picking on minor issues with companies, support the legitimate companies and keep the execs off petty name calling on the forums. Cash, you are not the first capex exec to get involved in a pointless thread. Step up and lead on the exchange, don't drag it down with ridiculous and petty issues. I know you all think your job is to pick up the slack that Arbitrage doesn't have time to deal with, but I can't imagine this is what he envisioned when he hired you. Focus!!! | ||
| Oct 11th 2007, 19:44 Sando Haller |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Question worth considering Re: Question worth considering |
|
| Cash, again this is irksome. What is your point in trying to cause an up and coming IPO problems. ImA is so involved in SL, he almost becomes bothersome with his steady contact and checking to see that investors feel he is maintaining a strong path to a successful company. I believe ImA has spent more hours than Cash and Lindsay combined working his project to a successful launch. Lindsay, your blog says you will stay off these forums. How about honoring that if you don't have anything positive to say to an up an comer. Just because Ima didn't bow to you when you were president of Capex is no reason to trash talk him now. Run your compaines and make me some money there. Capex execs, FOCUS! Picking fights with CEO's in the forums is not productive. Emails and IM's are much more appropriate and effective. I am a large investor in Capex as well as Mech and I don't appreciate the tenor of Capex execs towards CEO's of companies on the exchange. Work with them, not against them!! | ||
| Oct 19th 2007, 13:11 Sando Haller |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Selloff of Capex Shares Selloff of Capex Shares |
|
| First, let me say I understand the efforts to try and take the rubble of SLMS and do something positive for all investors. With that said, I would like to know how much longer is Mr. Bogart going to continue selling off his capex shares to keep the price depressed. Is there any end in sight so we might see how the stock might perform without a large investors dumping shares? The original announcement said he had sold off 1.7 mil shares. We are now just 10k short of 2 mil shares. Is there and end target here? Or should we just sit back and wait for Allens shares to be unlocked so those can be dumped and further depress the price. | ||
| Oct 20th 2007, 19:56 Sando Haller |
Allen Recovery Forum » Any Progress MR Allen? Re: Any Progress MR Allen? |
|
| Mr. Bogart, Why is it everytime I click into one of these forums and see posts by you, they are condescending and arrogant. The forums were put up here to initiate open discussion between stockholders. Even the dictionary's definition of forum is for the discussion of questions of public interest. Arnaud and others have as much right to post here as you do Mr. Bogart. Forgive us if we are not in the inner circle of the good ole boy's club which seems to revel in non public intimate facts and discussions contstantly plagueing all the financial markets here in SL. Our opinions and views are based on what we have access to and regardless of your lowly opinion of the stockholders of the very exchange that you were generously gifted a large %; we still continue to have the right to express them. People have a lot of assets that have been taken from them by Mr. Allen and obviously work to continue to try and come up with solutions; even when it is based on their lowly limited information; it is a good thing. Not something to be stifled. If you have some useful information you want to share with the lowly investers, I am sure we would all welcome it. Otherwise, I really wish you would concentrate on running the exchange and your new enigma of a company and let people engage in some healthy exchange and debate in the forums. |
||
| Oct 21st 2007, 12:28 Sando Haller |
Allen Recovery Forum » Any Progress MR Allen? Re: Any Progress MR Allen? |
|
| Cliff, I think that ungrateful lacky might be referring to me. Or maybe all of us minion investors as a whole. Who knows. At this point I would expect nothing more from Mr. Bogart. I guess your financial education didn't include any public relations 101 classes. I know someone will say this is not the time or place for this, but I find the ongoing condescention equaly as irksome as allen's lack of action. BTW, if Arbitrage is looking for a buyer for Allen's shares of Capex, have him look me up. I think that might give me enough shares make a motion the exchange pursue an exchange head who doesn't feel like us lackies are a bug on his arm. | ||
| Nov 4th 2007, 16:40 Sando Haller |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Selloff of Capex Shares Re: Selloff of Capex Shares |
|
| Well Bo, I guess you have seen fit to sell off another half million shares. Where would a lowly lacky find your promised report. |
||
| Nov 4th 2007, 19:03 Sando Haller |
SL Capital Exchange Archive » Selloff of Capex Shares Re: Selloff of Capex Shares |
|
| Nice that others aren't playing nice so you can present yourself superior here Bo. I still personnally have some problems with a top exec at Capex being the trustee on those recoved funds from one of SL's most famous "incidents." What happended to a nuetral 3rd party. Not that you are not well intended, but once again it reaks of conflict of interest. Why can't sl financial markets set some self limits on how far they venture. New people come in talk the talk of truth, justice, fairness and transperancy, and then proceed to incestuously spread themselves from positions of power in an exchange, to owner of their own tremendously successful company, to the self pronounced sl compass of ethics. I truely hope you don't follow the path of those before you. You are certainly on the same path we have seen many times over the past year. You say "as an EXECUTIVE, that is good business." Which hat are you wearing in this comment. I tend to get all your hats mixed up as they continue to multiply. My prediction, and feel free to bring it back up to me in February 08; is that you will be overwhelmned by the combination of your rl/sl obligations and need to have someone take over some if not all of your duties and companies. Why not do less and do it all well for a longer period. I would love to see an exchange stay stable for over six months with stable management. Someone please feel free to explain how Bo the capex president, Bo the Company owner of a company spawned by a backroom deal that still has me scratching my head, and Bo the "trustee" of Allen's leftovers does not present uncountable layers of conflict. |
||
1 | 