Important: Please Read Disclosure.
Go to Capital Exchange HQ to open an account now!




   

All posts by Sean4you Shepherd

Mar 12th 2008, 02:18
Sean4you Shepherd
General Investment Discussion » SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors
SLCAPEX opinion of frankly spoken investors

Edited by moderator Mar 12th 2008, 14:55
Quote from Bogart Beck.

"Perhaps you can take Spm with you Sean... clearly neither of you wish to be here...

Better yet, why don't the two of you run along now and go start your own Exchange - I'm sure you'd be a grand success!

BTW, next time you consider IPO'ing a company somewhere and you propose to trade in RW securities, I'd suggest you do a little legal research FIRST... oh, and read the Terms of Service of the Exchange you seek to list on... EVERYTHING you need to know is in the first two sentences of our Disclosure Statement, as follows;

The SL Capital Exchange is a FICTITIOUS STOCK MARKET SIMULATION operating SOLELY as an Element to an online GAME. It is NOT a REAL WORLD SECURITIES ENTITY and does NOT offer ANY opportunity for REAL WORLD PROFITS or INVESTMENT.

Run along now kids... "
Mar 12th 2008, 02:21
Sean4you Shepherd
General Investment Discussion » SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors
Re: SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors

Edited by moderator Mar 12th 2008, 04:44
Bogart.
Thank you for your nice advice Bogart.
If i didnt want to be here i would have left long time ago.
You wonder why ?
Because the SLCAPEX with its ambitions was the best stockexchange when i entered some time ago. And it can still be.

If SLCAPEX dont like when customers express their opinion when something can be improved , or whatever. Why do SLCAPEX have a forum ? Why do SLCAPEX ask for things to improve when SLCAPEX obviously dont want negative critique ??
Why have policies when we dont have to comply ?
Isnt it reasonable for me to demand answers to questions ?
Isnt it reasonable as a shareholder in SLCAPEX (at least i was until yesterday) to get an explanation of invoice bills not yet payed which eats up a divident of 1000 000 L ?

Maybe YOU Bogart could express what you expect of us investors, small as big, so we know how YOU want us to act?

Want us to shut up and accept whatever SLCAPEX put on the table ?


"The SL Capital Exchange is a FICTITIOUS STOCK MARKET SIMULATION operating SOLELY as an Element to an online GAME. It is NOT a REAL WORLD SECURITIES ENTITY and does NOT offer ANY opportunity for REAL WORLD PROFITS or INVESTMENT"

Bogart would you please tell me DO SLW comply with that policie ? As SLW invest in RL securities wich havent matured yet ? At least JTF did BEFORE the conversion to SLW and money are still invested in RW equities ( is that right word ?)
I think its reasonable to expect companys who wants to list to be treated concistent.

And BTW, i am an old grumpy man. And i also appreciate ppl who speak frankly. So i thank you for being honest and frank to me Bogart.

But please dont forget, i am not writing because i like to make trouble, i dont like to spend a lot of energy argueing with ppl. But there is a point when i cant keep quite anylonger. And thats when ppl treat other improper and with disrespect of other ppls money. I also reacts when rules are set up but we/comanys dont have to comply !!

As you already know its better to remove rules which nobody follows than have any rules at all. Thats simple leadership.

Mar 12th 2008, 04:34
Sean4you Shepherd
General Investment Discussion » Another company for IPO ?
Re: Another company for IPO ?

Edited by moderator Mar 12th 2008, 05:13
Gen
You maked me laugh. You are soooo right.

About SIS its most likely very easy to make good financial reports because there will be an unique account for the company where all transactions will be revealed apart from money transferred to SL.
There will be transaction history provide from the broker which will be posted to shareholder before monthly shareholder meetings.

As i can understand by Bogart Beck my IPO application will be rejekted because my business idea is against US law.
I have to do some investigation about this matter. I havent connections in US so there will be some difficulties for me to find out. To mee it seems a little strange because its not about issue entities, its about trading in entities issued by a markemaker . To be a markemaker for this derivatives and options they have to have permission. But thats not my businessidea. Anyway it is allowed to trade in Sweden by anyone which have signed a deal with some bank or broker. I would be surprised if it isnt working the same way in US. We do have E-trade in Sweden and thats a US broker.
Mar 12th 2008, 05:07
Sean4you Shepherd
General Investment Discussion » Another company for IPO ?
Re: Another company for IPO ?

Edited by moderator Mar 12th 2008, 05:26
As i understand the company have to follow the rules/law for the country where the stockexchange is. Sounds fair enough.

Nothing is impossible Isegrim. I know another way.
And your idea would be interesting too. Noooo.
Its very interesting..... Do you think thats possible within SL ? To run an island on my server placed in Sweden? Hmm didnt think LL allowed that. But i still have to list on an exchange somewhere else.


I have checked e-trade.com. And if its allowed to trade by private persons why not within an "unlisted" company ? Doesnt make sense to me.
Anyhow. I just e-mailed www.e-trade.com some questions.
I am convinced there is some misunderstanding. Now i get it.

Its mixed up with funds investing other ppl:s money. SIS will NOT be a fund. Its a company.
Mar 12th 2008, 05:37
Sean4you Shepherd
Capital Exchange Archive » Dividends
Re: Dividends
I agree with you on that Manuela.
Mar 12th 2008, 05:45
Sean4you Shepherd
Capital Exchange Suggestions » Observationlist
Re: Observationlist
This was an honest and fair attempt to find a solution so investors could get a hint there is something to find out before they decide to invest.

Making fun of this suggestion is to make fun of what ppl need to know before they decide what to buy.
Mar 12th 2008, 06:13
Sean4you Shepherd
General Investment Discussion » Another company for IPO ?
Re: Another company for IPO ?

Edited by moderator Mar 12th 2008, 06:22
Thats great Isegrim.
I really dont have to create a company as i am trading private. Actually i am in front of my monitors 14 hours a day.
But it would have been fun to show up a good example how a company can handle and reveal anything relevant for shareholders. Keeping promises, dates etc.
And beside, at least it was a little safer for someone to invest in a listed company which has to comply with some rules.


Hmm and i was looking forward to announce a divident of
2 000 000 ..........lol.
Mar 12th 2008, 14:51
Sean4you Shepherd
General Investment Discussion » SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors
Re: SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors

Edited by moderator Mar 12th 2008, 14:52
I suppose there is some ppl who thinks the forum is for those who are CEO:s or is in the board of directors or native Americans. well educated of course. Not an idiot who cannot even speak proper english.
Ohhh, not to mention how unintelligent most of us are.

I wonder how many who would like to write their good ideas in this forum when they can expect someone from slcapex use that language Bo did about their/our foolish attempts.

Best , biggest and most beautiful in the world. Just confirmed.

Mar 13th 2008, 02:26
Sean4you Shepherd
Capital Exchange Suggestions » Observationlist
Re: Observationlist
LNLBT Miles

Is this already done ?
Could you please explain because i havent seen anything of it yet. I might have overlooked this feature.
Mar 13th 2008, 05:37
Sean4you Shepherd
General Investment Discussion » SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors
Re: SLCAPEX:s opinion of frankly spoken investors

Edited by moderator Mar 13th 2008, 05:42
Cash
If you dont put out some announcements that you are working with these issues and in what way, you will always get questions from anxious investors.
Its about information provided to those who need some facts before the decision where to invest money.

Its look like you care more about Companies than investors.
Thats will not make a reliable stockmarket in which investors trust. I and more with me understand the difficulties but questions must be answered and to provide information makes ppl feel more safe.
Thats is common sense among any company.

I suppose all of you who are CEO:s or directors of board have some experience from leadership so it wouldnt be a surprise if i and others persist to have answers on unanswered questions. We are worried about our money .
Those who provide information have a lot of responsibility for how ppl react and write on forum.
More information = less questions.

If you are not sure how to handle information, i would be delighted to help..
I have about 20 years of experience of RL leadership in different positions.



This website © 2008-2013 Capital Exchange (CapEx). All rights reserved.
Second Life, SL, and inSL are trademarks of Linden Research, Inc. Capital Exchange (CapEx) is not affiliated with or sponsored by Linden Research.