All posts by Sean4you Shepherd
| Apr 17th 2008, 01:01 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » Ridicolous Re: Ridicolous |
|
| Could you please specify whats tha problem with the financials you provide. Some details please. Hmm, exactly what doesnt Bo accept ? Just trying to understand the issue. Sean |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 11:28 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair |
|
| Ivan, dont do it.. Its too risky. You might never ever be the same..... :) lolol |
||
| Apr 17th 2008, 11:40 Sean4you Shepherd |
Zhenya Zoning Real Estate Co. » March 2008 Financials Re: March 2008 Financials |
|
| I think you forgot to change date on the sheet. "Period ending 30 nov 2007" must be an old one. |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 09:21 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair Edited by moderator Apr 18th 2008, 09:22 |
|
| Insouciant I think you overlooked JTIC. What is different between JTF, JTIC, BCX ? No need to answer, i just wanted to do a reminder. |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 09:33 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » XXX SHAREHOLDERS MEETING - Temptations Lounge Re: XXX SHAREHOLDERS MEETING - Temptations Lounge |
|
| Huff According to transcript from the recent meeting some pll seems to think CEO shouldnt be among the BoD. Interest of conflicts. Thats wrong as i said before, you shold change this. All companys in RL have CEO among BoD. But not being the chairman. [2008/04/12 16:16] Kubi Beam: Thanks, but I can't be member of the BoD because I am the CEO. [2008/04/12 16:16] Shaynee Xi: you can not be the head of the BOD? [2008/04/12 16:16] Dimitri Gasser: nope, conflict of interest |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 09:39 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » Hostile Takeover? Re: Hostile Takeover? |
|
| Well , i believe this is going to be a hostile take over. A nice little coupe with Dimitri as conductor. Another conspiracy theory made up by the bitchy troublemaker Sean :). |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 09:42 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » Ridicolous Re: Ridicolous |
|
| I have asked before in this thread but didnt get an answer. Ill try again. What exactly was it that SLCAPEX didnt like about YEP:s financials ? |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 11:44 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » Ridicolous Re: Ridicolous |
|
| Danielz. Thanks for the link. I must have ovelooked the updated post on financials. Will be interesting to have a look of the previous, rejekted financials. |
||
| Apr 18th 2008, 12:40 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Archive » A sugestion how Arb could Fair Re: A sugestion how Arb could Fair |
|
| Insouciant You are right, and i was wrong. No forced conversion in JTIC. However the money might be invested similar to SLW money. The difference though are JTIC owners still got interest/divident payed every month. |
||
| Apr 19th 2008, 08:53 Sean4you Shepherd |
Capital Exchange Suggestions » Review of SLCAPEX policy Review of SLCAPEX policy Edited by moderator Apr 19th 2008, 08:57 |
|
| I suggets the SLCAPEX BoD to review the policy so listed companies can comply to the policy. For example should this part be discussed. "The SL Capital Exchange is a FICTITIOUS STOCK MARKET SIMULATION operating SOLELY as an Element to an online GAME. It is NOT a REAL WORLD SECURITIES ENTITY and does NOT offer ANY opportunity for REAL WORLD PROFITS or INVESTMENT." According to Nestlers post about meeting with MNM, they seems to give priority to establish a RL media company and also bring it to SL. That is against SLCAPEX policy. There are of course other examples but this is the most recent. http://www.slcapex.com/home/story/NIC/1618 This is NOT criticism, its a suggestion for improvements which wouldnt prevent MNM to relize their businessplan. Hmm, maybe its SLCAPEX that doesnt comply with the policy since it offer opportunity for real world profits and investments..... |
||
