Subscribe to this topic
Forums > GVConsulting > Topic: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions
| Apr 15th 2012, 13:50 Kafka Frugel |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| FYI, based on feedback we have received, we are going to place before shareholders an SPO for 165,000 shares, bringing us to the original number IPO'd. We will post the ROI and investment structure expected from SPO. Thanks, everyone, for input. |
||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 9th 2012, 17:12 Kafka Frugel |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| Hi Dibando, and thanks for the explanation. The two components for analysis you mention are, of course, valuable. Relative to GVC, those costs for marketing are low at this time. Our development costs include mesh, but are not solely mesh. To date we have used 100,000 for mesh development. The largest development expenditure thus far has been the 700,000 for augmented reality development, detailed prior to, and included in, financials for February. Hope that clarifies. The share number question is one not based financial need; it is directly related to the number of shares originally intended for shareholders at IPO. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts. |
||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 9th 2012, 11:42 Dibando Resident |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions
Edited by author Jan 30th, 15:16 |
|
| . | ||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 9th 2012, 07:45 Kafka Frugel |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| Not sure what you mean by #2, Dibando. Can you explain? | ||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 8th 2012, 19:48 Dibando Resident |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions
Edited by author Jan 30th, 15:18 |
|
| . | ||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 6th 2012, 05:23 Kafka Frugel |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| More good points. Thank you, Alain. | ||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 6th 2012, 02:05 Alain Delpiaz |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| Hi there Kafka, and thanks for bringing this up. I remember at the IPO stage some shares were left unsold. I think that was mainly due to no track record for GVC and an unusually high price per share for an IPO on CAPX. I think the track record and ROI questions have been now answered :) and i think it would be good for GVC to sell those 150K shares as well. Reasons: a) a wider shareholder body will generate more ideas, more diverse opinions. We are stronger together. b) it will generate more liquidity, as in it will be easier to buy into the company and we would want that for reason A, as you will never know who comes aboard and what kind of opportunities rise from that. And of course Skip will be happy as well, as more shares would switch hands. And for what goes for cash at hand, then i agree as well, put it to work! Maybe save 10% of it in reserve as a rainy day fund - you neve know when you are going to need cash. Alain |
||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 5th 2012, 19:11 Kafka Frugel |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| Excellent points, Marishka. Thank you. | ||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 5th 2012, 18:38 Marishka Ixito |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| Kafka, I agree with Legolas on both issues. As for availability of the shares on the market, that will settle itself automagically, assuming the company results will keep coming, in line with what we've seen sofar, investor confidence will keep growing, pushing the shares up until they reach a market conform dividend yield. At such a point, you'll start seeing existing shareholders increasingly willing to part with part of their GVC holdings, if only because the weight of the GVC shares in their portfolios will start to feel uncomfortable. Patience is the word here, the shares will remain scarce only as long as they're undervalued :) kind regards, Marishka |
||
| log in to reply | ||
| Apr 5th 2012, 18:01 Kafka Frugel |
Re: Shareholder Brains: Two Questions | |
| 2. Thanks, Legolas. Correct, we have no need for additional Lindens. Our reserves are high. The question was originally posed by a couple of other shareholders wanting to know if we planned to do an SPO. Guessing it was due to share availability on the market. Look forward to hearing more responses. | ||
| log in to reply | ||
1 | 